Shoe in politics

Nepotism, political patronage and vested interests (including religion-based, caste-based, sect-based support) have made many of the persons participating in the electoral fray shoo-in candidates for political office.  This is especially true where many of the supporters are barefoot, eking out a hand-to-mouth existence and believing that their sole salvation lies in electing their well-heeled candidates.

 

In constituencies where the electorate is more knowledgeable, many voters have put their foot down and refuse to toe the dominant party line.  Some of the bolder citizens (including a couple of journalists) have resorted to thinking on their feet as their unlaced emotions compel them to toss their shoes at the candidates running for office.  It is ironic that political candidates who reach out to impress the public and the press, now feel hard pressed to retreat and are expressing their views from a safe distance.  Some tactile politicians have tactfully increased their handlers while reducing their glad-handing contact with their voters to keep their candidacies intact.

 

Narendra Modi, the CM of Gujarat has resorted to protecting himself from free-flying footwear by installing a wire mesh around his podium.  There seem to be a number of souls in the state with a disdainful disposition who have taken a position on dispossessing their shoes.  A minority village in the Narmada area has strung up a line of old shoes at the entry point to the village.  The villagers want to ensure that most overreaching political candidates will understand the underlying message as they stand under the arch of shoes.

 

Mayavati, the UP CM has relegated the press to a safe location, beyond a “shoe throw” distance.   Mayavati has not discriminated in terms of the caste of the press but cast the press far enough to prevent them from casting their footwear or other projectiles and yet kept the press near enough so that they can broadcast her every word. 

 

As for the clutch of shoe throwers, they have not confined their throws to one political party but they have hurled their footwear on or near several candidates of their choosing.  If the incidence of shoe throwing proliferates, this could even become a national pastime and several voters might attempt to throw as many shoes as necessary to obtain an entry in the Guinness book of records. 

 

Some sure-footed politicians, ever ready to see the golden streaks in the silver lining of rusting metal, might even be inclined to convert these signs of disrespect into signs of approval.  One politician could boast that his constituents were not only ready to give the shirts off their backs but also the shoes off their feet.  Another might counter that he was on the receiving end of the most number of shoes and it was a definite sign that the electorate wanted to ensure he had enough shoes to go the distance in his run for political office.

 

The risk the politicians might face is that instead of “foot in the mouth” syndrome they might be stricken with a severe case of “shoes in your face”.  As for the electorate, some voters will have the satisfaction of literally giving the boot to their politicking politicians.

 

(www.embar.net – for additional articles)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: